Our offices will be closed on Wednesday 29th April for a firm‑wide staff training day. Telephone lines will remain open; emails will be responded to from Thursday 30th April.
Thank you for your understanding.
Proud to be celebrating 170 years in business
As the festive period approaches, many look forward to rest, celebration and time with those close to them.
For individuals who lack capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 or who are detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended), however, this time of year can involve complex decisions about care, contact and personal freedom.
Seasonal gatherings, including Christmas, can hold deep emotional significance. The courts have long recognised that family contact and meaningful personal experiences can play an important role in a person’s wellbeing.
In Aintree University Hospitals NHS Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67, Lady Hale emphasised that best-interest’s decisions must be assessed “in the widest sense, not just medical but social and psychological,” giving appropriate weight to a person’s wishes, feelings, values and beliefs. This requires decision-makers to look beyond risk and consider what the individual would themselves regard as a worthwhile and meaningful life experience. For many people, time with family during the festive period contributes to identity, connection and emotional health. Such occasions are therefore not ‘optional extras’ but can form a relevant part of a holistic best-interests assessment, especially where they have been important to the person in the past.
In R (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58, the House of Lords held that any restriction on a detained patient’s liberty must be proportionate, individually justified and the least restrictive option. Although the case concerned seclusion, the principles apply broadly to decisions made under the Mental Health Act 1883 (as amended). Leave generally and over the festive period, must be considered on an individual basis and should not be withheld as a default position. Munjaz supports a presumption in favour of allowing therapeutic, relational and meaningful opportunities unless there is clear evidence that a lesser restriction is not possible.
Questions such as where a person should spend a particular day, whether they should visit family, or what additional support might be needed may seem simple, yet they can have significant effects on wellbeing. Seasonal traditions often reinforce connection, identity and emotional stability, making thoughtful decision-making especially important at this time of year.
As the year draws to a close, it remains essential to uphold the rights, dignity and individuality of those who may be most affected by the decisions made on their behalf. The principles established by the courts, from the holistic best-interests approach in Aintree to the proportionality requirements in Munjaz, both cases remind us that meaningful contact, connection and personal autonomy should be supported wherever safely possible.
For many people, the festive period represents more than a date on the calendar; it can offer reassurance, routine and a sense of belonging. Ensuring that these opportunities are considered thoughtfully and lawfully is a vital part of supporting vulnerable individuals.
From all of us in the Court of Protection and Mental Health teams at Biscoes Solicitors, we hope this festive period brings moments of comfort, understanding and connection, and we remain committed to supporting decision-making that keeps the individual’s rights, wishes and wellbeing at the centre.
Our Court of Protection and Mental Health teams are here to help. If you have questions about best interests, leave arrangements, or lawful decision-making, contact us today to ensure your approach is both compassionate and compliant.
📞 Call us: 023 9266 0261
📧 Email us: info@biscoes-law.co.uk
Search site
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry